Zero-Player Game Became a Window to Artificial Life

In 1970, mathematician John Conway unleashed something astonishing: a grid-based simulation so simple it could be described in four rules, yet so rich it sparked debates about life, death, and the origins of intelligence. Known as The Game of Life, this “zero-player game” doesn’t need a controller or a goal. It simply unfolds. And what unfolds is mesmerizing—gliders, blinkers, and patterns that pulse, split, or vanish like digital bacteria under a microscope.

Conway, a brilliant and eccentric British mathematician wanted to model how complexity could arise from simplicity—a mathematical petri dish where artificial life might spontaneously emerge. Inspired by the work of John von Neumann on self-replicating machines, Conway created a cellular automaton: a two-dimensional grid where each square (or “cell”) lives, dies, or reproduces based on its neighbors.

When he shared his invention with Scientific American in 1970, where Martin Gardner’s popular column introduced it to a wider audience, the game took on a life of its own. Early enthusiasts ran simulations on mainframes and punched paper tapes to hunt for elusive patterns—some stable, some chaotic, others looping endlessly. The “glider,” a tiny configuration that perpetually moves across the grid, became iconic.

What began as a mathematical curiosity turned into a proving ground for ideas in computation, chaos theory, and even artificial intelligence. Incredibly, The Game of Life is Turing complete, meaning it can, in theory, simulate any computer program. Decades later, Conway’s creation is still a staple in computer science education, a sandbox for generative artists, and a metaphor for emergence across disciplines—from biology to economics. And it remains profoundly humbling: from four simple rules, entire universes of behavior emerge, defying prediction yet governed by logic.

Craving more? Check out the source behind this Brain Snack!