Why is Hard to Remember More Than 7 Things

George A. Miller’s 1956 work, The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information, became one of the most cited papers in psychology by introducing a core insight: our working memory—the mental space where we temporarily store and manipulate information—is limited to about seven items at a time. This insight would be so influential that it would change the way we design things.

To arrive at this conclusion, Miller analysed data from multiple experiments, particularly those involving absolute judgment and short-term memory span. In absolute judgment tasks, participants were asked to differentiate between stimuli, such as tones or colors, and their accuracy declined sharply beyond seven choices. In memory span tests, subjects were asked to recall lists of digits, letters, or words in order, and performance consistently dropped when lists exceeded roughly seven items.

Miller’s discovery had far-reaching implications, influencing decisions in fields like telecommunications, interface design, and cognitive ergonomics. Phone numbers, for example, were formatted into seven-digit chunks to align with our memory limits. Similarly, menu options, product categories, and website navigation structures were often designed to keep choices within this range, ensuring users weren’t overwhelmed. This insight became a guiding principle in user experience (UX) design, shaping how information was structured for human consumption.

However, modern neuroscience has refined Miller’s estimate, with many researchers now suggesting that our working memory capacity is approximately four items, especially when dealing with complex chunks. This revision invites a compelling question: if we truly can only juggle four things at once, how should we structure our work, learning, or daily decisions to reflect this fundamental constraint?

Craving more? Check out the source behind this Brain Snack!